Westmead HospitalWhistleblowersFollow on Twitter @WhiteRabbitWB
  • The William Tarnow Mordi Scandal
  • Incompetence and Coverup at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS, UK
  • The Price of Speaking Out: Australia's Hostile Environment for Whistleblowers
  • Assange: Corruption of UK Justice System
  • Westmead Hospital loses Accreditation
  • Dr Benjamin Koh: Hero
  • Dr John Pardey
  • What's New on Westmead Hospital Whistleblowers?
  • Professor Peter Illingworth: The first reprisal
  • Dr Andrew Baker and Mr Graham Evans: The second reprisal.
  • Dr Andrew Pesce and Belinda Nicholson: The Third Reprisal
  • Westmead Hospital admits staff were unreasonable
  • If you are concerned about the Death of a baby at Westmead Hospital ...
  • Brad Astill
  • Brad Astill Goes
  • Whistleblowing is for the Birds!
  • Tarnow Mordi promoted by University of Sydney
  • The Mobbing of Lyn Downe
  • John Pardy Goes
  • If you are concerned about the Death or Injury of a baby at Nepean Hospital ...
  • Bryan Mckee Hatta and Westmead Hospital's Coverup.
  • Westmead Hospital expenditure while in debt
  • Resources and Help
  • What Animal Behavior Teaches Us About Bullying
  • Definition of Bullying (and Mobbing)
  • Support Groups
  • Dropbox for Whistleblowers
  • Australian Public Service Dropbox
  • Anonymous Whistleblowing
  • Encryption. Keep your communication Safe
  • Graphics of how TOR and PGP work
  • Videos on bullying and mobbing
  • Myths about Workcover NSW What everyone should know
  • The William Tarnow Mordi scandal
  • Widespread Medical Malpractice in Queensland
  • Queensland medical board members resign
  • Julian Assange
  • Search Page
  • University of Newcastle put on Notice
  • 21 Ways To Skin A Whistleblower
  • UK NHS invitation to end your career
  • Whistleblowing and Freedom of Speech and the Press in the USA
  • American Collateral Murder
  • Why are there Leaks from the US?
  • Enercon Services to appeal nuclear plant whistleblower case
  • Great Quotes
  • Whistleblower Protection legislation Internationally
  • Do we need Codes or Guidelines to Combat Workplace Bullying?
  • Jillian Skinner: Bullying in NSW Health rife.
  • Keep the Torch Alight
  • Workcover (who is supposed to protect us from bullying) to be investigated for bullying
  • Whistleblowers in History
  • Victorian Bullying Employer ordered to pay A$600,000
  • OMG! China is becoming just like America.
  • The inportance of not being seen - revisited.
  • A fan of humiliating the guilty party at the workplace - by Trevor Roberts
  • Schools that say 'NO' to bullying
  • Child Bullying Death: Petition for Laws
  • The Mobbing of Dr Raj Mattu
  • How to Deal with Bullying by Diane Peters
  • Poland has anti-mobbing laws. Why don't we?
  • Turkey has anti-mobbing Laws. Why don't we?
  • Will the Government ever support whistleblowing and whistleblowing protection legislation
  • Whistleblowers Australia Conference 2014
  • Phil Vardy: Blew the Whistle on Australia's first major scientific fraud case
  • Recovery from Whistleblowing; Whistleblowers Conference 2014
  • Westmead Hospital Still Functioning Poorly
  • Obama's War on Whistleblowers: Another Kangaroo Court Conviction
  • Whistleblowing in Australia is for the birds
  • Two Year Australian Data Retention
  • Your Comments
  • Whistleblowers Australia 2015 Conference
  • Whistleblower News
  • Report Animal Abuse
  • National Whistleblower Appreciation Day
  • CARD: Fight Back, a page for teachers
  • The Sad Fate of America's Whistleblowers
  • Levon Khachigian and the concerns about his research
  • The Dr Paolo Macchiarini Scandal
  • North West Disability Service Scadal

The Mobbing of Lynette Downe at Nepean Hospital

​Whistleblowers Australia 2015 Conference. Click here.
​


This site is experiencing high volume for searches of "Lynette Downe and Heather Coughtrey"
Please take a moment to confidentially let us know why you came to this site.
Click here to give us feedback

Millions of Health Dollars Wasted by Local Health District.
Originally Posted on
16 May  2011 by whistlebloweraustralia
 
Dr Downe appeals in the Supreme Court against her unlawful
treatment by Sydney West Area Health Service
.


Introduction


There appears to be an ongoing lack of accountability, transparency  and
governance at Sydney West Area Health Authority as shown by the  bullying and
reprisals against Dr Downe, the one doctor who was willing  to speak out for the
her patients.


Numbers in brackets in the text below refer to the paragraph numbers in
Justice Rothman’s judgement.


In summary Justice Rothman found that Sydney Area Health Service had  acted
unlawfully, and granted injunctive relief to Dr Downe preventing  Sydney West
Area Health Service or NSW Health from suspending her  indefinitely at their
will. (466). His Honour also found that Dr Downe  was an excellent clinician who
was correct to be concerned about the  quality of care that was being provided
in her unit.


The Background


Dr Lynette Downe was, and is, the Director of the Nepean Hospital  Neonatal
Intensive care Unit. The other neonatologists (baby  specialists) were Dr Mark
Tracy, Dr Heather Coughtrey and Dr Jan Klimek. From Dr Downe up the managers
were an Obstetrician Dr John Pardey who  was Clinical Director of Woman’s and
Children’s Health, a nurse Maya  Drum, a Professor of Nursing Jane Gordon who
was Director of Clinical  Operations, and a Master of Health Services Management
(MHSM) Mr Mark  Cormack who was Executive Director of Nepean Hospital.


Dr Downe was of the opinion that general paediatricians had no place  in
treating babies requiring intensive or special care in a dedicated  Neonatal
Intensive care Unit. This view is shared by the specialists in  most NSW
Neonatal Intensive Care Units. And yet the management at Nepean Hospital failed
to implement the finding of three external reviews at  Nepean Hospital that
supported Dr Downe’s views. Non-medical managers,  Mr Cormack in particular,
simply imposed their own views on the Unit in  order to placate the
paediatricians (189, 190).


Dr John Pardey insisted that Dr Downe must attend high risk  deliveries at
the Nepean Private Hospital. Dr Pardey delivered private  patients there and no
doubt they would be reassured to know that a ‘baby specialist’ was on hand at
their deliveries. Dr Downe’s usual medical  indemnity insurance, which covered
her as Director of the neonatal  intensive care unit at Nepean Hospital where
she was employed, did not  cover her at the Nepean Private Hospital (86) where
she was not  employed. And her attendance at the Private Hospital was not
required by her employer Sydney West Area Health Service. Dr Downe declined to 
attend Dr Pardey’s private deliveries at the Private Hospital. She was  employed
full time, at tax payer’s expense, in the public health system  by Sydney West
Area Health Service.


That Dr Downe found it difficult to deal with Dr Pardey is shown by  Dr
Pardey’s own complaint that Dr Downe refused to meet with him unless  her Union
representative was present (A13). Presumably Dr Downe had a  right to have a
representative present if she felt she needed one.


In March 2004 the Client Liaison Officer at Nepean Hospital disclosed a
pattern of complaints against Dr Coughtrey from parents of patients  in the
Neonatal Unit (170). Shortly after that Mr Mark Cormack suggested and initiated
an external investigation and Report of the Neonatal Unit (the Reynolds Review)
(171, 175). Mr Cormack, however, knowingly  allowed the other doctors in the
Neonatal Unit to mistakenly believe  that the investigation was initiated by Dr
Downe for the purpose of  discrediting Dr Heather Coughtrey (180-184).
Predictably this led to a  breakdown of trust between Dr Downe and the other
doctors in the Unit  (150, 183).


The Complaints


On the 28 June 2004 Dr Downe wrote a letter to Mr Mark Cormack,  Executive
Director of the health service. The letter raised a series of  matters that were
said to give rise to a pattern of victimisation of Dr  Downe as a result of her
raising genuine concerns about matters of  patient safety and medico-legal
issues. (36 – 38)


Unfortunately for Dr Downe she went on two months long service leave three
days later.


Dr Mark Tracy was appointed Acting Director of the Unit while she was away.
Dr Downe believed herself to be on friendly terms with Dr Tracy  at this time.
Dr Tracy had asked Dr Downe to be a mentor to his  daughter.


On the 17 August 2004, fourteen days before Dr Downe was due to  return from
Long Service Leave, Dr John Pardey submitted a formal  complaint about Dr Downe.
A flood of complaints followed. Justice  Rothman said that “the timing of the
complaints was beyond coincidence” (35). The complaints appeared to have been
coordinated.


The further complaints were from Dr Heather Coughtrey 19 August, Dr  Mark
Tracy 23 and 24 August and Professor of Paediatrics Ralph Nanan 25  and 26
August.


Justice Rothman noted a pattern of emails ending on the 16 August,  the day
before Dr John Pardey’s formal complaint, between Mr Mark  Cormack, the Chief
Executive of Nepean Hospital, and Mr Geoff Murphy of  the workplace relations
(Human Resources) department of Sydney West Area Health Service. They were
advising at least one of the ‘complainants’ about how to structure their formal
complaints (35).


The suspension.


Dr Downe was suspended before she could return from long service leave on the
6 September.


Mr Cormack and the Sydney Area Health Service (now the Blue Mountains and
Nepean Local District) used these complaints as a reason to suspend Dr Downe
pending an investigation by the Honourable Russell Peterson SC into the
complaints. Later the suspension was unlawfully continued  indefinitely despite
the Peterson Report being overwhelmingly in Dr  Downe’s favour (56, 103).


Dr Downe had already felt that she was the victim of a systematic campaign
against her (37).


Sydney West Area Health Service insisted that in the alternative Dr  Downe
would be transferred to the Westmead Hospital Neonatal Service  where Professor
Tarnow Mordi was Director.


The Terms of Reference for the review were agreed between Dr Downe,  the
complainants and Sydney West Area Health Service. It should be noted that an
incorrect and detrimental version of the terms of reference was given to the
Honourable Russell Peterson by Sydney West Area Health  Service (40) until this
was belatedly corrected by Dr Downe. Mr Mark  Cormack also detrimentally briefed
(prejudiced) Mr Peterson about  matters not related to the Terms of Reference
(205).


The correct terms of reference are given at (40) including the  complaints
against Dr Downe (A) and submissions in reply by Dr Downe  (B).


Sydney West Area Health Service knew that at least one of the  allegations
that they made, on oath in court,  was false. None of the allegations  necessitated suspending Dr  Downe (50).


It was clear to Justice Rothman that the Honourable Russell Peterson  QC
found that most of the allegations against Dr Downe were not  substantiated and
those that were substantiated were minor or  inconsequential (56). The finding
of a complete breakdown of  relationships between Dr Downe and the other doctors
was spurious and  arose from the actions of Mr Mark Cormack and his briefing of
The  Honourable Russell Peterson rather than from the facts (150, 184, 205).


Dr Downe’s continuing suspension by Sydney West Area Health Service  and the
Department of Health was found to be unlawful (466) and  unwarranted (56). In
theory Dr Downe could anticipate a speedy return to her position as Director of
the Neonatal Unit at Nepean Hospital.


Demeanour in Court


His Honour Justice Rothman commented on the demeanour (behaviour) of the
witnesses in Court.


Dr Lynette Downe


“I reiterate that Dr Downe was a person whose evidence I accept for  the
reasons set out already and that conclusion applies to all of her  evidence and
the conflicts that arise in the evidence” (78). “Dr Downe  has exceptional
clinical capacity” (2).


Dr John Pardey


Dr John Pardey was willing to swear (on oath) to the details of a 
conversation, but under cross examination Dr Pardey changed his storey  and
agreed that the conversation probably never took place. This was  consistent
with the general behaviour of Dr Pardey in Court (82).


Justice Rothman accepted that Dr Downe felt intimidated by words used by Dr
Pardey (88).


Dr Jane Gordon


Professor of Nursing Jane Gordon was the Director of Clinical  Operations for
Sydney West Area Health Service. Her attitude was to  sheet home the blame to Dr
Downe for the breakdown of personal  relationships. “In doing so, Professor
Gordon disadvantages Dr Downe”. On the contrary his Honour found that “a very
significant part of the  personal relationship breakdown has been caused
directly by management  action or lack of action” by Sydney West Area Health
Service. The  management’s actions were inappropriate (97).


Professor Gordon expressed the view that the Peterson Report was not  in
favour of Dr Downe despite being taken to various findings of the  Report
showing that all the complaints were either not substantiated or  were
inconsequential (95).


Mr Geoffrey Murphy


Law graduate and health administrator Mr Geoffrey Murphy was the  Human
Resources person involved in Dr Downe’s unlawful suspension by  Sydney West Area
health Service. Mr Murphy accepted that the findings of the Peterson Inquiry
were overwhelmingly in favour of Dr Downe (103).  He accepted that he did not
let other staff involved in the case know of this view.


Ms Maya Drum


Nurse Ms Maya Drum and Paediatric Professor Nanan investigated an  allegation
that Dr Downe had said “I have to stop paediatricians from  killing babies on
level 4”. Ms Drum recorded that she supported the  person making the allegation.
Ms Drum’s note records that “as there were no witnesses willing to take a stand
we have reached an impasse”.


In Court it was shown that not only was there a witness willing to  take a
stand, but that witness was willing to give evidence that Dr  Downe had NOT said
the words alleged (129). Yet Sydney West Area Health  Service persisted in
making this allegation to the Peterson Inquiry and  in the Supreme Court.
Justice Rothman considered this behaviour to be  inappropriate (131).


Dr Jan Klimek


Dr Jan Klimek said that Dr Downe said at a meeting “Heather (Dr  Heather
Coughtrey) is lazy, incompetent and inefficient.” All the  Neonatologists except
Dr Coughtrey were present. None of them disagreed  with Dr Downe. (133)


Dr Mark Tracy


Dr Mark Tracy had a friendly relationship with Dr Downe. Dr Tracy had asked
Dr Downe to be a ‘mentor’ to Dr Tracy’s daughter. When she went  on long service
leave Dr Downe still believed that she had a friendly  relationship with Dr
Tracy.


Dr Mark Tracy was appointed Acting Director of the neonatal Unit  while Dr
Downe was on long service leave. He continued in that position  when Dr Downe
was unlawfully suspended in part due to his own complaints (136).


Justice Rothman found that “Dr Tracy’s evidence in cross-examination was
obfuscatory and his recollection convenient” (137).


While Dr Mark Tracy was in the position of Acting Director he changed the
clinical practice of Dr Downe and allowed general paediatricians to work in the
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. This was inconsistent with  the recommendations of
the independent reviews that had been done and  inconsistent with the practice
in other neonatal intensive care units in NSW. This was done at the direction of
Mr Mark Cormack prior to the  finalisation of the Peterson Inquiry and prior to
the finalisation of  the Reynolds Report (190).


It appears that Dr Tracy acquiesced to a non-medical administrator dictating
medical policy in the unit.


Dr Heather Coughtrey


Dr Heather Coughtrey asserted that she was clinically on an equal  footing
with Dr Downe. But Justice Rothman accepted that the evidence  proved the
opposite (138).


“During her evidence, Dr Coughtrey sighed in exasperation, rolled her eyes,
did not make eye contact and crossed her arms. She continually  shrugged her
shoulders and smirked…. Her demeanour was arrogant in the  extreme, her memory
at best convenient and she gave the impression that  she was reluctant to give
evidence and very careful to ensure that the  minimum information was given, to
the point of being obfuscatory. She  was, at times, disparaging and dismissive
of other staff in the answers  that she gave in the courtroom” (142).


One of Dr Coughtrey’s complaints against Dr Downe was that she was  required
to work 1 day per year extra than she felt she should (165).


“ Dr Coughtrey said she could not remember recent criticisms …(but)  when it
became clear that there were notes of the meeting relating to  those criticisms,
her memory returned” (143).


“ Unless otherwise accepted by another believable witness, or subject to
independent documentary corroboration, I do not accept Dr  Coughtrey’s
evidence.” (143).


Mr Mark Cormack


Mr Mark Cormack was the Executive Director of Nepean Hospital.


“Mr Cormack was a difficult witness. He seemingly deliberately gave evidence
that was ambiguous or misleadingly short” (147).


“Mr Cormack’s actions are at the heart of the dispute between the  parties. A
proper analysis of the acceptable evidence attributes to Mr  Cormack the
responsibility for the breakdown in personal relationships  to the degree that
occurred” (150).


Justice Rothman found that SWAHS was undeserving of trust or belief. “It is
to the discredit of senior management of the Health Service that  this matter
was even the subject of a serious investigation.  Nevertheless, it was and,
given the role of Mr Cormack, it is  understandable that it was” (169).


Justice Rothman found that Mr Cormack knew, and even caused, the  mistaken
belief that the other doctors held to the effect that Dr Downe  had initiated
the Reynolds Review to discredit Dr Coughtrey (183), and  Mr Cormack then had encouraged
them to complain about it, and then had used those  complaints to call the
Peterson Inquiry and to suspend Dr Downe (184).


Mr Cormack said that there was a possibility of reprisals against the other
doctors by Dr Downe. “It is an allegation by Mr Cormack” without  basis in fact
“of alleged mala fides of Dr Downe, if not her criminal  behaviour. Yet it was
contained in an affidavit settled by the Health  Service” (145).


His Honour found Mr Cormack’s evidence to be marked by obfuscation and most
unsatisfactory (147).


The outcome


After further obstacles were placed in her path Dr Downe was finally 
reinstated functionally as Director of the Neonatal Unit at Nepean  Hospital. It
had taken over four years.


Mr Mark Cormack left the Area Health Service to become the Chief  Executive
of ACT Health and then the first Chief Executive Officer of  Health Workforce
Australia.


Professor Jane Gordon was on the Board of Directors of the College of Nursing
in 2007 and became Director of Nursing Rashid Hospital, Dubai,  UAE.


Dr Mark Tracy was promoted by Sydney West Area Health Service to  Director of
the Neonatal Unit at Westmead Hospital. Professor Tarnow  Modi had not been
reappointed Director.


Dr Jan Klimek transferred to the Neonatal Unit at Westmead Hospital.


Dr Heather Coughtrey remained at Nepean Hospital.


Dr John Pardey remains in private practice and at Nepean Hospital.


Legal issues of Note


A large part of the findings were of legal interest. Perhaps a  precedent was
set regarding the misuse of Health Administration Policies for unlawful
purposes. Certainly infinite suspension had been found to  be unlawful
and Sydney West Area Health Service was found not to have appropriately addressed bullying. 


The Australian Salaried Medical Officers’ Federation (ASMOF) NSW was  very
concerned that Health Services (now Local Health Districts) simply  choose not
to follow their own Health Policies, including their  anti-bullying policies,
and did not accord due process to its employees. ASMOF believes that Health
Districts’s Human Resources personnel  require training in the notion of
procedural fairness
Section 2.2 of Suspension ASMOF submission to NSW
Health.



ASMOF appears to point to Human Resources manager Mr Geoffrey Murphy  rather
than Mr Mark Cormack as the main actor in unlawfully continuing  the suspension
of Dr Downe.


Many of the issues brought up during the Supreme Court Appeal were  rightly
not relevant to the Judgement of His Honour Justice Rothman.  These issues still
remain unaddressed by the Nepean and Blue Mountains  Local health District (and
its precedent, Sydney West Area Health  Service). These issues are still of
public interest. There is still no  visible response to, or consequences for,
the unacceptable behaviour and  actions of the staff involved. There is still no visible response to  unlawful conduct by  management, there is still no visible response to
questionable behaviour in Court and there is still no visible response to valid
questions of  patient safety, fitness to practice and accountable governance in 
Obstetrics, Paediatrics and the Neonatal Unit.


The Cost to the Taxpayer.


According to Natasha Wallace of the Sydney Morning Herald 
Dr Downe spent almost One Million Dollars on her case. Dr Downe was  later awarded costs so Sydney West Area Health Service and the Health  Department paid most of her costs in addition to the costs of
the Area  Health Services and Dr Downe’s salary during the years she was 
unlawfully suspended. This money was unwisely spent. There is an irony  in
Sydney West Area Health Services’ alleged Aims and Objectives which  include
“Providing a Service that is accountable and value for money” and “Supporting
our skilled workforce”.


The Department of Health noted in their Annual Report 2008
NSW Health Annual Report 2008 pg 241 that His Honour  also found there were implied terms of mutual  trust and confidence, as well as  an implied term of good faith, in Dr  Downe’s contract of employment. It is a
sad indictment that his Honour  would need to make a finding on an issue that
all doctors would hope  they could take for granted. The public would prefer
that NSW Health  would base its relationships with doctors on confidence and
good faith.


Postscript.


The systematic campaign to silence Dr Downe and rob her of her career was fully exposed in the judgement of his Honour Justice Rothman in the Supreme Court. But there is little to show that anything has changed since then.


The judgement is discussed in detail because it illustrates a  problem
with our health system that needs to be addressed. It is a  judicial document in
the public record and is examined as fair comment  and is educative of the need
for a public inquiry because the identified problems in the renamed remnants of
the old Sydney West Area Health  Service remain unaddressed.


Sydney West Area Health Service has been split into a number of  networks
(now called Districts) with new names. Two of the networks that were formed from
the original Sydney West Area Health Service are now  called the Nepean and Blue Mountains Local Health District which manages the Nepean Hospital and the Western Sydney Local Health District which  manages Westmead Hospital.


The Sydney West Area Health Service spent Millions of  dollars in managerial salaries, lawyer’s fees, court costs and damages  in a failed and unlawful bid to silence and harm Dr  
Downe. Millions of  dollars that could have been better spent on caring for patients.


Sydney West Area Health Services was shown to violate its own  policies and procedures, to apparently view itself as above the law and  to lack transparency and governance. It was
shown to be willing to  systematically bully anyone who speaks out.


The judgement of Justice Rothman in the Supreme Court of New South  Wales
documents the mobbing of Dr Lynette Downe by the very people who  were her
colleagues and by those managers who had a duty of care to  protect her. Downe v
Sydney West Area Health Service (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 159 (3 July 2008).

Next Page: The Tarnow Mordi Scandal


John Pardey

Click to follow on Twitter:
Proudly powered by Weebly