Westmead HospitalWhistleblowersFollow on Twitter @WhiteRabbitWB
  • The William Tarnow Mordi Scandal
  • Incompetence and Coverup at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS, UK
  • The Price of Speaking Out: Australia's Hostile Environment for Whistleblowers
  • Assange: Corruption of UK Justice System
  • Westmead Hospital loses Accreditation
  • Dr Benjamin Koh: Hero
  • Dr John Pardey
  • What's New on Westmead Hospital Whistleblowers?
  • Professor Peter Illingworth: The first reprisal
  • Dr Andrew Baker and Mr Graham Evans: The second reprisal.
  • Dr Andrew Pesce and Belinda Nicholson: The Third Reprisal
  • Westmead Hospital admits staff were unreasonable
  • If you are concerned about the Death of a baby at Westmead Hospital ...
  • Brad Astill
  • Brad Astill Goes
  • Whistleblowing is for the Birds!
  • Tarnow Mordi promoted by University of Sydney
  • The Mobbing of Lyn Downe
  • John Pardy Goes
  • If you are concerned about the Death or Injury of a baby at Nepean Hospital ...
  • Bryan Mckee Hatta and Westmead Hospital's Coverup.
  • Westmead Hospital expenditure while in debt
  • Resources and Help
  • What Animal Behavior Teaches Us About Bullying
  • Definition of Bullying (and Mobbing)
  • Support Groups
  • Dropbox for Whistleblowers
  • Australian Public Service Dropbox
  • Anonymous Whistleblowing
  • Encryption. Keep your communication Safe
  • Graphics of how TOR and PGP work
  • Videos on bullying and mobbing
  • Myths about Workcover NSW What everyone should know
  • The William Tarnow Mordi scandal
  • Widespread Medical Malpractice in Queensland
  • Queensland medical board members resign
  • Julian Assange
  • Search Page
  • University of Newcastle put on Notice
  • 21 Ways To Skin A Whistleblower
  • UK NHS invitation to end your career
  • Whistleblowing and Freedom of Speech and the Press in the USA
  • American Collateral Murder
  • Why are there Leaks from the US?
  • Enercon Services to appeal nuclear plant whistleblower case
  • Great Quotes
  • Whistleblower Protection legislation Internationally
  • Do we need Codes or Guidelines to Combat Workplace Bullying?
  • Jillian Skinner: Bullying in NSW Health rife.
  • Keep the Torch Alight
  • Workcover (who is supposed to protect us from bullying) to be investigated for bullying
  • Whistleblowers in History
  • Victorian Bullying Employer ordered to pay A$600,000
  • OMG! China is becoming just like America.
  • The inportance of not being seen - revisited.
  • A fan of humiliating the guilty party at the workplace - by Trevor Roberts
  • Schools that say 'NO' to bullying
  • Child Bullying Death: Petition for Laws
  • The Mobbing of Dr Raj Mattu
  • How to Deal with Bullying by Diane Peters
  • Poland has anti-mobbing laws. Why don't we?
  • Turkey has anti-mobbing Laws. Why don't we?
  • Will the Government ever support whistleblowing and whistleblowing protection legislation
  • Whistleblowers Australia Conference 2014
  • Phil Vardy: Blew the Whistle on Australia's first major scientific fraud case
  • Recovery from Whistleblowing; Whistleblowers Conference 2014
  • Westmead Hospital Still Functioning Poorly
  • Obama's War on Whistleblowers: Another Kangaroo Court Conviction
  • Whistleblowing in Australia is for the birds
  • Two Year Australian Data Retention
  • Your Comments
  • Whistleblowers Australia 2015 Conference
  • Whistleblower News
  • Report Animal Abuse
  • National Whistleblower Appreciation Day
  • CARD: Fight Back, a page for teachers
  • The Sad Fate of America's Whistleblowers
  • Levon Khachigian and the concerns about his research
  • The Dr Paolo Macchiarini Scandal
  • North West Disability Service Scadal

OBAMA'S WAR ON WHISTLEBLOWERS

By PHILIP GIRALDI , a former CIA officer, is executive director of the Council for the National Interest. • February 12, 2015

SOURCE: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/obamas-war-on-leaks-skirts-the-constitution/

The Obama administration is gloating over the recent conviction of Jeffrey Sterling. But some serious doubts persist over whether Sterling actually did anything illegal. The agreed that there was no evidence in court that he had leaked anything. But he was still convicted under the draconian Espionage Act of 1917

The Espionage Act, designed to catch and convict enemy agents during wartime, gives the prosecution considerable leeway in terms of how it defines and conducts its case. Prosecutors can cite national security as an excuse to limit what would be considered normal constitutional protections such as the right to confront one’s accuser. They can also restrict access to certain types of information on national security grounds and order investigations within the government definition of what constitutes probable cause, to include someone’s searching the internet for information that might be regarded as “suspicious.”

Prosecutors can also divide their case into separate counts to ensure success even if there is a failure to convict on some of the charges. Even though Sterling was accused of only one leak the specific counts against him included seven separate elements linked to the alleged crime. Mimicking the curious language employed by the Act itself, two of the charges include causing journalist James Risen to write a 2003 article, as well as the account of Merlin contained in his book State of War.

Sterling, who may or may not have revealed details of the secret government program, has been hailed as a whistleblower by defenders responding critically to the high level of government secrecy prevailing during the past 14 years. The government prosecutors for their part claimed that Sterling had revealed details of Operation Merlin to Risen, who in turn described the program both in detail and in extremely negative terms in State of War, which came out in 2006.

Sterling, who had gone through established whistleblower channels in his attempt to expose the failings of Merlin by approaching the Senate Intelligence Committee in 2003, insisted that he was not the source for Risen. His defense team suggested instead that someone on the congressional staff could just as easily have leaked the information, an alternative that was not seriously considered by the government attorneys.

Once the trial started, the prosecutors focused on discrediting Sterling as a government employee, citing an alleged poor work record and history of disgruntlement that led to a claim of racial discrimination, while producing a series of witnesses who were allowed to testify from behind screens and using only their first names so they could not be identified. 

Merlin involved giving defective plans for a nuclear weapon to Iran by way of a Russian scientist who was paid more than $400,000 to serve as the principal agent for the transfer. Risen’s view, expressed in his book, was that Merlin was ill-conceived, mismanaged, and disastrous. It was “hopelessly botched, and possibly backfiring by giving the Iranians blueprints that could be useful to them if they sorted out the good information from the errors.” He called it an operation “conducted in the darkest corner of the American national security establishment.”

The government prosecutors made no effort to prove that Sterling ever actually spoke to Risen. 

Jeffrey Sterling could not testify in the trial on his own behalf. 

Only witnesses who praised Merlin were allowed to be called.  

Jeffrey Sterling will be sentenced in federal court in Alexandria on April 24th and is facing up to 80 years in prison.


Donate to the Sterling Family Fund, set up to help the now impoverished Sterling. 
http://www.gofundme.com/lg8xxs


Proudly powered by Weebly